Did Berkeley Completely Misunderstand the Basis of the Primary-Secondary Quality Distinction in Locke?

In Colin M. Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Berkeley’s Ideas and the Primary/Secondary Distinction.Steven Nadler - 1990 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):47-61.
Locke on primary and secondary qualities.Samuel C. Rickless - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (3):297-319.
Primary and secondary qualities.Peter Ross - 2016 - In Mohan Matthen (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception. Oxford University Press. pp. 405-421.
Mechanism, resemblance and secondary qualities: From Descartes to Locke.Keith Allen - 2008 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):273 – 291.
Primary and Secondary Qualities.Robert A. Wilson - 2016 - In Matthew Stuart (ed.), A Companion to Locke. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Blackwell. pp. 193-211.
Reconsidering the basis of Locke's primary‐secondary quality distinction.Laura Keating - 1998 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6 (2):169 – 192.
Substance, reality, and primary qualities.Jonathan Bennett - 1965 - American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (1):1-17.
The primary-secondary quality distinction.Edward Wilson Averill - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (July):343-362.
Primary and secondary qualities: A return to fundamentals.David Novitz - 1975 - Philosophical Papers 4 (October):89-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-09

Downloads
13 (#978,482)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references