Journal of Business Ethics 30 (2):161 - 169 (2001)

The question of corporate moral responsibility – whether corporate bodies can be held morally responsible for their actions – has been debated by a number of writers since the 1970s. This discussion is intended to add to that debate, and focuses for that purpose on our understanding of the organisation. Though the integrity of the organisation has been called into question by the postmodern view of organisations, that view does not necessarily rule out the attribution of corporate agency, any more than the postmodern view of the person rules out the attribution of individual agency. The postmodern view is opposed to a reifying, metaphysical view of corporate agency, but a semantic view of corporate agency would seem to sit more comfortably with it. A bigger problem for the idea of corporate moral responsibility arises from the fact that in Kantian terms organisations are not ends in themselves. In that sense they are not like persons, and this must limit their autonomy, and their responsibility. This aspect of organisations also limits their punishability. For these reasons corporate moral responsibility must be seen as more limited than the responsibility of persons.
Keywords agent  corporate  moral  personhood  postmodern  responsibility
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1006346125667
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Punishment and Responsibility.H. L. A. Hart - 1968 - Philosophy 45 (172):162-162.
The Corporation as a Moral Person.Peter A. French - 1979 - American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (3):207 - 215.
Why Corporations Are Not Morally Responsible for Anything They Do.Manuel G. Velasquez - 1983 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 2 (3):1-18.
Personal Being.Charles Travis & Rom Harre - 1985 - Philosophical Quarterly 35 (140):322.
The Concept of Corporate Responsibility.Kenneth E. Goodpaster - 1983 - Journal of Business Ethics 2 (1):1 - 22.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Fallacy of Corporate Moral Agency.David Rönnegard (ed.) - 2015 - Springer Netherlands.
The Impossibility of Corporate Ethics: For a Levinasian Approach to Managerial Ethics.David Bevan & Hervé Corvellec - 2007 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 16 (3):208–219.
Anomie and Ethics at Work.Eva E. Tsahuridu - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 69 (2):163-174.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Corporate Versus Individual Moral Responsibility.C. Soares - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 46 (2):143 - 150.
Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Personhood.Rita C. Manning - 1984 - Journal of Business Ethics 3 (1):77 - 84.
The Idea of Corporate Social Responsibility.Jacob Dahi Rendtorff - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:111-117.
Unredistributable Corporate Moral Responsibility.Jan Edward Garrett - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (7):535 - 545.
Corporate Moral Responsibility: When It Might Matter.Michael J. Phillips - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (3):555-576.
Corporate Moral Responsibility in Health Care.Stephen Wilmot - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (2):139-146.


Added to PP index

Total views
97 ( #121,855 of 2,518,020 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,045 of 2,518,020 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes