In Elizabeth Barnes (ed.), Current Controversies in Metaphysics. Taylor & Francis. pp. 105-125 (2017)

Jessica M. Wilson
University of Toronto at Scarborough
Here I compare two accounts of metaphysical indeterminacy (MI): first, the 'meta-level' approach described by Elizabeth Barnes and Ross Cameron in the companion to this paper, on which every state of affairs (SOA) is itself precise/determinate, and MI is a matter of its being indeterminate which determinate SOA obtains; second, my preferred 'object-level' determinable-based approach, on which MI is a matter of its being determinate---or just plain true---that an indeterminate SOA obtains, where an indeterminate SOA is one whose constitutive object has a determinable property, but no unique determinate of that determinable. In S1, I first note an important difference between our accounts, concerning whether MI is taken to induce propositional indeterminacy; in S2, I highlight and defend certain advantages of my account; in S3, I address certain of Barnes and Cameron's objections to my account.
Keywords indeterminacy  vagueness  metaphysical indeterminacy  meta-level account  object-level account  state of affairs  states of affairs
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Modelling Deep Indeterminacy.George Darby & Martin Pickup - 2021 - Synthese 198:1685–1710.
Quantum Metaphysical Indeterminacy.Claudio Calosi & Jessica Wilson - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (10):2599–2627.
A Determinable-Based Account of Metaphysical Indeterminacy.Jessica M. Wilson - 2013 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 56 (4):359-385.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Set Theory with Indeterminacy of Identity.Peter Woodruff & Terence Parsons - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (4):473-495.
Metaphysically Indeterminate Existence.Elizabeth Barnes - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (3):495-510.
Indeterminate Comprehension.Jonathan A. Simon - 2014 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):39-48.
Tensed States of Affairs and Possible Worlds.Quentin Smith - 1988 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 31 (1):225-235.
Identity and Indeterminacy.David Winthrop Cowles - 1991 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Truth Breakers.Dale Jacquette - 2010 - Topoi 29 (2):153-163.
Worldly Indeterminacy: A Rough Guide.Nicholas J. J. Smith & Gideon Rosen - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):185 – 198.
Quantum Mechanics and Metaphysical Indeterminacy.George Darby - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2):227-245.
Peirce on the Indeterminate and on the Object: Initial Reflections.Jay Zeman - 1988 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 32 (1):37-49.
Reply to Martin.D. M. Armstrong - 1997 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (2):214 – 217.
On the Possibility of Indeterminacy.David Brian Barnett - 2003 - Dissertation, New York University
What There is, How Things Are.Peter Ossorio - 1997 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 27 (2&3):149–172.


Added to PP index

Total views
180 ( #65,161 of 2,506,503 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #59,928 of 2,506,503 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes