Anselm on truth

In Brian Leftow, The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 204-221 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A good place to start in assessing a theory of truth is to ask whether the theory under discussion is consistent with Aristotle’s commonsensical definition of truth from Metaphysics 4: “What is false says of that which is that it is not, or of that which is not that it is; and what is true says of that which is that it is, or of that which is not that it is not.”1 Philosophers of a realist bent will be delighted to see that Anselm unambiguously adopts the Aristotelian commonplace. A statement is true, he says, “when it signifies that what‐is is.”2 But the theory of truth that Anselm builds on this observation is one that would surely have confounded Aristotle. For no matter what the topic, Anselm’s thinking always eagerly returns to God; and the unchallenged centrality of God in Anselm’s philosophical explorations is nowhere more in evidence than in his account of truth. Indeed, we see in the student’s opening question in De veritate that the entire discussion has God as its origin and its aim: “Since we believe that God is truth, and we say that truth is in many other things, I would like to know whether, wherever truth is said to be, we must acknowledge that God is that truth.”3 The student then reminds Anselm that in the Monologion he had argued from the truth of statements to an eternal Supreme Truth. Does this not commit Anselm (the student seems to be asking) to holding that God himself is somehow the truth of true statements? But what definition of truth could make sense of such an odd claim? Anselm is happy to take up the challenge of showing that his description of God as “Supreme Truth” is no mere metaphor, but the expression of the deepest insight into the nature of truth. An account of truth is just theology under a different name. This first distinctive characteristic of Anselm’s theory, the centrality of God as Supreme Truth, helps account for a second distinctive characteristic: its strong insistence on the unity of truth. All truth either is God or somehow reflects God; thus, one simple being provides the....

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,650

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anselm on Truth.Alice Ramos - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:183-197.
Anselm on Truth and Goodness.Alice Ramos - 2014 - Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 21:85.
Hegel Facing Anselm: God, Evil, and Truth.Daniel E. Shannon - 2001 - In John R. Fortin, Saint Anselm: His Origin and Influence. Lewiston, USA: Mellen Press. pp. 161-182.
Hegel Facing Anselm: God, Evil, and Truth.Daniel E. Shannon - 2001 - In John R. Fortin, Saint Anselm: His Origin and Influence. Lewiston, USA: Mellen Press. pp. 161-182.
Anselm on Truth and Truth-telling.Katherine Rogers - 2020 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 94:45-57.
Truth and Justice in Anselm of Canterbury.Ubaldo R. Pérez-Paoli - 1994 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 17 (1-2):127-151.
Thomas Aquinas on the Claim that God is Truth.William Wood - 2013 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (1):21-47.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
106 (#220,094)

6 months
14 (#308,610)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

A Justiça Política em Aristóteles.Tania Schneider da Fonseca - 2011 - Anais Do II Congresso Internacional de Filosofia Moral E Política.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references