A Fair Range of Choice: Justifying Maximum Patient Choice in the British National Health Service [Book Review]

Health Care Analysis 15 (2):59-72 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper I put forward an ethical argument for the provision of extensive patient choice by the British National Health Service. I base this argument on traditional liberal rights to freedom of choice, on a welfare right to health care, and on a view of health as values-based. I argue that choice, to be ethically sustainable on this basis, must be values-based and rational. I also consider whether the British taxpayer may be persuadable with regard to the moral acceptability of patient choice, making use of Rawls’ theory of political liberalism in this context. I identify issues that present problems in terms of public acceptance of choice, and also identify a boundary issue with regard to public health choices as against individual choices



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Enterprise Association or Civil Association? The Uk National Health Service.Andrew Edgar - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (6):669-688.
Socialism and the British National Health Service.Martin Powell - 1997 - Health Care Analysis 5 (3):187-194.
Free Choice, Equity, and Care: The Moral Foundations of Health Care.Chan Ho-mun - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (6):624 – 637.
What Would a Socialist Health Service Look Like?Bob Brecher - 1997 - Health Care Analysis 5 (3):217-225.
Necessary Conditions for a Socialist Health Service.Calum Paton - 1997 - Health Care Analysis 5 (3):205-216.


Added to PP

17 (#634,134)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?