Religious Studies 52 (4):451-460 (2016)

Authors
Erik Wielenberg
DePauw University
Abstract
I advance a challenge to the coherence of Alvin Plantinga’s brand of theism that focuses on Plantinga’s celebrated free-will defence. This challenge draws on (but goes beyond) some ideas advanced by Wes Morriston. The central claim of my challenge is that Plantinga’s free-will defence, together with certain claims that are plausible and/or to which Plantinga is committed, both requires and rules out the claim that it is possible that God is capable of engaging in moral goodness. I then critically evaluate an interesting strategy for responding to my challenge inspired by some recent work by Kevin Timpe, arguing that the response ultimately fails. The upshot of the paper is that Plantinga’s brand of theism is internally inconsistent; furthermore, because the claims that are in tension with the free-will defence are ones that many theists are likely to find attractive, many theists are not able to appeal to Plantinga’s free-will defence in responding to the logical problem of evil.
Keywords Plantinga  free will defense
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412516000135
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Ockham’s Way Out.Alvin Plantinga - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (3):235-269.
The Defeat of Good and Evil.Roderick Chisholm - 1968 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 42:21 - 38.
Transworld Depravity, Transworld Sanctity, & Uncooperative Essences.Alvin Plantinga - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (1):178-191.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Free Will Defense Revisited: The Instrumental Value of Significant Free Will.Frederick Choo & Esther Goh - 2019 - International Journal of Theology, Philosophy and Science (4):32-45.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Religious Adequacy of Free-Will Theism.David M. Ciocchi - 2002 - Religious Studies 38 (1):45-61.
Ideal Worlds and the Transworld Untrustworthy.Michael J. Almeida - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (1):113-123.
Free Will and the Problem of Evil.James Cain - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (4):437-456.
A Simpler Free Will Defence.C’Zar Bernstein & Nathaniel Helms - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 77 (3):197-203.
A New Defence of Anselmian Theism.Yujin Nagasawa - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):577-596.
Christian Theism and the Free Will Defense: A Problem. [REVIEW]William J. Wainwright - 1975 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (4):243 - 250.
Modalities in the Free Will Defence.Douglas Walton - 1974 - Religious Studies 10 (3):325 - 331.
The Philosophical Case for Open Theism.Alan Rhoda - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):301-311.
Process Theism and Physical Evil.Ho Hua Chew - 1992 - Sophia 31 (3):16-27.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-30

Total views
85 ( #137,108 of 2,507,896 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #169,107 of 2,507,896 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes