Philosophia Christi 11 (1):113-127 (2009)
AbstractI examine the central atheistic argument of Richard Dawkins’s book The God Delusion (“Dawkins’s Gambit”) and illustrate its failure. I further show that Dawkins’s Gambit is a fragment of a more comprehensive critique of theism found in David Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Among the failings of Dawkins’s Gambit is that it is directed against a version of the God Hypothesis that few traditional monotheists hold. Hume’s critique is more challenging in that it targets versions of the God Hypothesis that are central to traditional monotheism. Theists and atheists should put away The God Delusion and pick up Hume’s Dialogues.
Similar books and articles
David Hume: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and Other Writings.Dorothy Coleman (ed.) - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Dawkins' God less delusion.J. Angelo Corlett - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (3):125 - 138.
Playing fast and loose with complexity: A critique of Dawkins' atheistic argument from improbability.Mark Sharlow - 2009
David Hume: Principal Writings on Religion Including Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and, the Natural History of Religion.J. C. A. Gaskin (ed.) - 1998/2009 - Oxford University Press.
Critical Study of Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion.Jerome Gellman - 2008 - Philo 11 (2):193-202.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Early-Modern Irreligion and Theological Analogy: A Response to Gavin Hyman’s A Short History of Atheism.Dan Linford - 2016 - Secularism and Nonreligion 5 (1):1-8.
The “who designed the designer?” objection to design arguments.Lloyd Strickland - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75 (2):87-100.
References found in this work
No references found.