Dawkins’s Gambit, Hume’s Aroma, and God’s Simplicity

Philosophia Christi 11 (1):113-127 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I examine the central atheistic argument of Richard Dawkins’s book The God Delusion (“Dawkins’s Gambit”) and illustrate its failure. I further show that Dawkins’s Gambit is a fragment of a more comprehensive critique of theism found in David Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Among the failings of Dawkins’s Gambit is that it is directed against a version of the God Hypothesis that few traditional monotheists hold. Hume’s critique is more challenging in that it targets versions of the God Hypothesis that are central to traditional monotheism. Theists and atheists should put away The God Delusion and pick up Hume’s Dialogues.


Added to PP

6,696 (#408)

6 months
306 (#1,418)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Erik Wielenberg
DePauw University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references