Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):241-264 (2015)
Abstract |
In research and teaching on ethical aspects of emerging sciences and technologies, the structure of working environments, spaces and relationships play a significant role. Many of the routines and standard practices of academic life, however, do little to actively explore and experiment with these elements. They do even less to address the importance of contextual and embodied dimensions of thinking. To engage these dimensions, we have benefitted significantly from practices that take us out of seminar rooms, offices and laboratories as well as beyond traditional ways of working and interacting. We have called one such practice the ‘walkshop’. Through walkshops, we have spent several days walking together with our colleagues and students in open outdoor spaces, keeping a sustained intellectual discussion on ethical aspects of science, technology and innovation while moving through these landscapes. For us, this has generated useful opportunities to escape established hierarchies, roles and patterns of thought and to rethink conceptual and philosophical issues from new perspectives, under new attitudes and with renewed energy. In this paper we wish to highlight the potential benefits of the walkshop approach by sharing some of our experiences and describing how we have prepared for and carried out these events. We share this information in the hope that we may encourage others to both experiment with the walkshop approach and exchange information on their own innovative processes for research and teaching in science and engineering ethics
|
Keywords | Ethics Science Technology Responsible innovation Environment Walkshop |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11948-014-9526-z |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea.Sheila Jasanoff & Sang-Hyun Kim - 2009 - Minerva 47 (2):119-146.
View all 11 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Methods for Practising Ethics in Research and Innovation: A Literature Review, Critical Analysis and Recommendations.Wessel Reijers, David Wright, Philip Brey, Karsten Weber, Rowena Rodrigues, Declan O’Sullivan & Bert Gordijn - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1437-1481.
Teaching Ethics to Engineers: A Socratic Experience.Gonzalo Génova & M. Rosario González - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):567-580.
Similar books and articles
Anticipating Ethical Issues in Emerging IT.Philip A. E. Brey - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (4):305-317.
Teaching Science at the University Level: What About the Ethics?Penny J. Gilmer - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (2):173-180.
Teaching Science at the University Level: What About the Ethics? [REVIEW]Dr Penny J. Gilmer - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (2):173-180.
Setting Up Spaces for Collaboration in Industry Between Researchers From the Natural and Social Sciences.Steven M. Flipse, Maarten C. A. van der Sanden & Patricia Osseweijer - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (1):7-22.
Teaching Science, Technology, and Society to Engineering Students: A Sixteen Year Journey.Haldun M. Ozaktas - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (4):1439-1450.
Ethics in the Classroom: A Reflection on Integrating Ethical Discussions in an Introductory Course in Computer Programming.Dennis C. Smolarski & Tamsen Whitehead - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (2):255-264.
The Why and How of Enabling the Integration of Social and Ethical Aspects in Research and Development.Steven M. Flipse, Maarten C. A. Sanden & Patricia Osseweijer - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):703-725.
The Why and How of Enabling the Integration of Social and Ethical Aspects in Research and Development.Steven M. Flipse, Maarten Ca van der Sanden & Patricia Osseweijer - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):703-725.
Philosophy of Technology and Macro-Ethics in Engineering.Wha-Chul Son - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):405-415.
Nano-Ethics as NEST-Ethics: Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology. [REVIEW]Tsjalling Swierstra & Arie Rip - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (1):3-20.
Eight-Dimensional Methodology for Innovative Thinking About the Case and Ethics of the Mount Graham, Large Binocular Telescope Project.Rosalyn W. Berne & Daniel Raviv - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):235-242.
Editorial Overview: Public Science and Technology Scholars: Engaging Whom?Erik Fisher - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):607-620.
On the Teaching of Science, Technology and International Affairs.Charles Weiss - 2012 - Minerva 50 (1):127-137.
From 'Implications' to 'Dimensions': Science, Medicine and Ethics in Society. [REVIEW]Martyn D. Pickersgill - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (1):31-42.
Midstream Modulation in Biotechnology Industry: Redefining What is 'Part of the Job' of Researchers in Industry. [REVIEW]Steven M. Flipse, Maarten C. A. Sanden & Patricia Osseweijer - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1141-1164.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-02-06
Total views
28 ( #405,835 of 2,498,995 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #210,368 of 2,498,995 )
2014-02-06
Total views
28 ( #405,835 of 2,498,995 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #210,368 of 2,498,995 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads