Modernisms endless: Ironies of the american mid-century: Daniel Wickberg

Modern Intellectual History 10 (1):207-219 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mid-twentieth century American intellectual history is in the midst of a boom; a younger generation of historians, now half a century distant from the era, and less inclined than their immediate forerunners to be committed to a vision of the 1960s as a critical turning point in modern culture, is reshaping what has been an underdeveloped field. Recent studies of thinkers such as C. Wright Mills, Ayn Rand, Lionel Trilling, and Whitaker Chambers, and subjects such as postcapitalist social thought and pollsters in mass society, to name a few, have regenerated interest in an arena that had once been dominated by studies of the New York Intellectuals and Richard Pells's useful summaries and evaluations of prominent intellectuals of the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s. The newer intellectual history of this period appears to be premised on several ideas: that the so-called “liberal consensus” of the era was an ideological product of liberalism itself, rather than an adequate description of the contours of thought; that thinking in terms of clear and sharp distinctions between right and left doesn't help us understand the ways in which ideas, sensibilities, and intellectual commitments were configured at mid-century; that there is a great deal more continuity in social, political, and cultural thought than an image of the 1960s as cultural watershed would allow; and that the mid-century decades are, in the most profound sense, the first years of our own time, with all the characteristic epistemic, moral, and critical problems that have characterized thought and culture in the world in which contemporary Americans live. What the Progressive Era was for mid-century historians and intellectuals such as Richard Hofstadter and Henry May, the mid-century, and particularly the early Cold War era of the late 1940s and 1950s, is, for the historian of today, the root of the destabilizing conundrums of modernity, particularly the puzzle of the role of critical intellect in a mass-mediated environment of socialized knowledge, feeling, and being.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Godless capitalism: Ayn Rand and the conservative movement.Jennifer Burns - 2004 - Modern Intellectual History 1 (3):359-385.
Considering capitalism in american social thought.Mark Pittenger - 2008 - Modern Intellectual History 5 (1):179-194.
A History of Philosophy in America: 1720-2000.Bruce Kuklick - 2001 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
The Role of Intellectuals in the Reform Process.Jean-Philippe Béja - 2003 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 34 (4):8-26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
23 (#641,102)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?