Challenging some myths about the right to life at the end of life. 1: Not an absolute right

Clinical Ethics 6 (4):167-171 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article, and a related one in the next issue, investigates some myths surrounding the application of the right to life at the end of life. The present article focuses upon the myth that the right to life is an absolute right, always requiring the preservation of life. It identifies three distinct situations in which state authorities may be justified in declining to take intervening action in order to save a life. It argues that the right to life encompasses recognition of the impossibility and undesirability of preserving human life in all circumstances and that recognition of this fact will render the right more useful in a health-care context

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,429

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Could Arsenic Bacteria Teach Us About Life?Emily C. Parke - 2013 - Biology and Philosophy 28 (2):205-218.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-06

Downloads
92 (#131,950)

6 months
1 (#417,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?