Whistleblowing in Biomedical Research: Policies and Procedures for Responding to Reports of Misconduct

[author unknown]
(1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Whistleblowing in Biomedical Research Policies and Procedures for Responding to Reports of Misconduct : Proceedings of a Workshop, September 21-22, 1981.inc United States, Medicine in the Public Interest & Aaas Committee on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility - 1981 - The Commission for Sale by the Supt. Of Docs., U.S. G.P.O.
How to blow the whistle and still have a career afterwards.C. K. Gunsalus - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):51-64.
Whistleblowing procedures at work: what are the implications for human resource practitioners?David Lewis - 2002 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 11 (3):202-209.
Improving biomedical journals’ ethical policies: the case of research misconduct.Xavier Bosch - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (9):644-646.
What’s in it for Me? An Examination of Accounting Students’ Likelihood to Report Faculty Misconduct.Joanne C. Jones, Gary Spraakman & Cristóbal Sánchez-Rodríguez - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 123 (4):645-667.
A review of the types of scientific misconduct in biomedical research. [REVIEW]Malhar N. Kumar - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):211-228.
Whistleblowing and organizational social responsibility: a global assessment.Wim Vandekerckhove - 2006 - Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Seven ways to plagiarize: Handling real allegations of research misconduct.Michael C. Loui - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):529-539.
Correction and use of biomedical literature affected by scientific misconduct.Anne Victoria Neale, Justin Northrup, Rhonda Dailey, Ellen Marks & Judith Abrams - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):5-24.
Assessing the Preparedness of Research Integrity Officers (RIOs) to Appropriately Handle Possible Research Misconduct Cases.Arthur J. Bonito, Sandra L. Titus & David E. Wright - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):605-619.
Misconduct in science and the German law.Stefanic Stegemann-Bochl - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):57-62.
Why fallout from whistleblowing is hard to avoid: Commentary on “The fallout: What happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?”.Joan E. Sieber - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):255-260.
Differing Perceptions Concerning Research Integrity Between Universities and Industry: A Qualitative Study.Simon Godecharle, Benoit Nemery & Kris Dierickx - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1421-1436.
Scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
Research Misconduct Policy in Biomedicine: Beyond the Bad-Apple Approach by Barbara K. Redman.Melissa S. Anderson - 2015 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 25 (3):5-9.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-27

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Legal Protections for the Scientific Misconduct Whistleblower.Peter Poon - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (1):88-95.
Legal Protections for the Scientific Misconduct Whistleblower.Peter Poon - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (1):88-95.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references