Aristotle and the problem of human knowledge

International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2 (1):41-64 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I shall argue that, according to Aristotle, the knowledge we may attain is profoundly qualified by our status as human knowers. Throughout the corpus, Aristotle maintains a separation of knowledge at the broadest level into two kinds, human and divine. The separation is not complete—human knowers may enjoy temporarily what god or the gods enjoy on a continuous basis; but the division expresses a fact about humanity's place in the cosmos, one that imposes strict conditions on what we may know, with what degree of certainty, and in what areas. While passages bearing on human knowledge are familiar, looking at them collectively and in comparison with certain other well known Aristotelian doctrines may significantly affect how we understand the goals of his philosophy and why our hopes for reaching them must be limited.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aristotle on Self-Knowledge and Friendship.Zena Hitz - 2011 - Philosophers' Imprint 11:1-28.
Full Human Flourishing.Mark K. Spencer - 2007 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:193-204.
Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach.Karl Raimund Popper - 1972 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Aristotle's biology.James Lennox - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
61 (#237,812)

6 months
5 (#246,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Wians
University of Notre Dame (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations