Modern Theology 3 (1):211--225 (1987)

Authors
Graham White
Queen Mary University of London
Abstract
We examine Gerhard Ebeling's arguments against the use of logic in theology and find them unconvincing, mainly because Ebeling knows very little about logic as practiced.
Keywords Theology  Methodology  Logic
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0025.1987.tb00153.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,316
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Linguistic Units.C. L. Ebeling - 1960 - S-Gravenhage.Mouton.
The Philosophy of Alternative Logics.Andrew Aberdein & Stephen Read - 2009 - In Leila Haaparanta (ed.), The Development of Modern Logic. Oxford University Press. pp. 613-723.
Compendium of the Study of Theology.Roger Bacon - 1988 - Leiden and New York: E.J. Brill.
Hegelian Spirit in Question: The Idealistic Spirit of Liberal Theology.Gary Dorrien - 2011 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (1):3 - 22.
Cooperation in Anonymity.Richard M. Ebeling - 1987 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 1 (4):50-61.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-12-23

Total views
12 ( #812,725 of 2,519,499 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,499 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes