Review of Metaphysics 28 (2):289 - 310 (1974)
AbstractAS SOME PHILOSOPHERS KNOW, the paradox about inquiry at 80d-e of Plato’s Meno is more than a tedious sophism. Plato is one such philosopher. The puzzle is an obstacle to his project of discovering definitions, and is introduced as such. And it is met with an elaborate response: the theory of recollection, explicitly presented as an answer to the obstacle. But then what of the famous conversation in which Socrates coaxes a geometrical theorem from a slave boy Is the theory not designed to explain the boy’s ability to respond to the coaxing? It is, certainly, but that is not its only purpose. The structure of the passage is this: the theory is there to disarm the paradox, and the conversation is there to support the theory. To see this structure is to understand a notorious and otherwise troubling fact, that Plato is so very quick to take the slave’s behavior—which he might have tried to explain in some other way-to be clear evidence for recollection. The reason why he so takes it is that the paradox has led him to think that only if recollection occurs is fruitful inquiry possible—and he is very anxious indeed to be assured that it is possible. He would not have been so enticed by explanations of the boy’s behavior which did not also seem to him to dispose of the puzzle. Here now is Plato’s setting of the paradox
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Deweyan Inquiry: From Education Theory to Practice.James Scott Johnston - 2009 - State University of New York Press.
John Dewey's Quest for Unity: The Journey of a Promethean Mystic.Richard M. Gale - 2010 - Prometheus Books.
Science, Knowledge, Wisdom and the Public Good.Nicholas Maxwell - 2003 - Scientists for Global Responsibility Newsletter (26 February 2003):7-9.
The Possibility of Value Inquiry as an Instrument of Social and Personal Transformation: Impressions of Russian Value Inquiry. [REVIEW]Richard T. Hull - 1996 - Journal of Value Inquiry 30 (1-2):85-87.
Lipman, Dewey, and Philosophical Inquiry in the Mathematics Classroom.Nadia Stoyanova Kennedy - 2012 - Education and Culture 28 (2):81-94.
Browning on Inquiry Into Inquiry, Part I.Tom Burke - 2009 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):27-44.
Rejecting the Urge to Theorise in Fallacy Inquiry.Louise Cummings - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (1):61-94.
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
John Cook Wilson on the Indefinability of Knowledge.Guy Longworth & Simon Wimmer - forthcoming - European Journal of Philosophy.
Can You Seek the Answer to This Question? (Meno in India).Amber Carpenter & Jonardon Ganeri - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):571-594.
Knowledge, Discovery and Reminiscence in Plato's Meno.Alejandro Farieta - 2013 - Universitas Philosophica 30 (60):205-234.
Conocimiento, descubrimiento Y reminiscencia en el menón de platón.Alejandro Farieta - 2013 - Universitas Philosophica 30 (60):205-234.
The Soul’s Tool: Plato on the Usefulness of the Body.Douglas R. Campbell - 2022 - Elenchos 43 (1):7-27.