Selflessness and Responsibility for Self: The Implications of Deference for Autonomy, Shared Agency and Love

Dissertation, University of Michigan (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this dissertation I argue that responsibility for self is an important feature of human agency, crucial to the autonomy of individual agents as well as to joint deliberation and the sharing of ends in relations of love and friendship. I argue that the sort of 'selflessness' involved in extreme self-abnegating deference undermines responsibility for self, and that it compromises the capacity to enter into fully reciprocal interpersonal relationships. Responsibility for self, on my view, consists in a disposition to hold oneself answerable to others as such, a dialogical form of reflectiveness that is unavailable to those entrenched in a practice of granting unconditional authority to the will of another. ;In the first chapter, I argue that self-abnegating deference constitutes a pathology of individual agency, despite the fact that it is not generally recognized as such by proponents of mainstream reflective-endorsement views such as that developed by Harry Frankfurt. In the next two chapters, I argue that this pathology of individual agency engenders a related pathology of plural agency, compromising the deferential individual's ability to participate in collective forms of practical deliberation. I develop a model of joint practical deliberation that builds on Margaret Gilbert's analysis of "plural-subjects," and I illustrate how the process of coming to share reasons and ends is compromised by certain kinds of asymmetry in perceived practical authority. In the final chapter, I draw out some implications of the earlier arguments for our understanding of how ends come to be shared between lovers and close friends. I examine the commonly held view that lovers' identities merge in ways that render inapplicable the distinction between selflessness and self-interest. I argue that this view relies on an implausible picture of what it would be to share a practical perspective. I draw on elements of the first three chapters to explain how interests and ends can be self-responsibly shared in relations of love and friendship

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Essentially Shared Obligations.Gunnar Björnsson - 2014 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 38 (1):103-120.
Practical Intersubjectivity.Abraham Roth - 2003 - In F. Schmitt (ed.), Socializing Metaphysics : The Nature of Social Reality. Rowman & Littlefield, 65-91. pp. 65-91.
Group Agency, Responsibility, and Control.Anders Strand - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2):201-224.
Deference as a normative power.Andrea C. Westlund - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (3):455-474.
Shared agency.Michael Bratman - 2009 - In Chrysostomos Mantzavinos (ed.), Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge University Press. pp. 41--59.
Corporate versus individual moral responsibility.C. Soares - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 46 (2):143 - 150.
Autonomy, Authority, and Answerability.Andrea C. Westlund - 2011 - Jurisprudence 2 (1):161-179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrea Westlund
Florida State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references