Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):513-514 (2005)
AbstractSteels & Belpaeme (S&B) describe the role of genetic evolution in linguistic category sharing among a population of agents. We consider their methodology and conclude that, although it is plausible that genetic evolution is sufficient for such tasks, there is a bias in the presented work for such a conclusion to be reached. We suggest ways to eliminate this bias and make the model more convincingly relevant to the cognitive sciences.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Does Nothing in Evolution Make Sense Except in the Light of Population Genetics?: Michael Lynch: Origins of Genome Architecture, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland Mass, 2007, 340 Pp, Hardback, ISBN-10: 0878934847.Lindell Bromham - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (3):387-403.
Some Reflections on Evolutionary Theories, with a Classification of Fitness.Klaus Henle - 1991 - Acta Biotheoretica 39 (2):91-106.
Realistic Constraints on Brain Color Perception and Category Learning.Stephen Grossberg - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):495-496.
Genetic Assimilation and a Possible Evolutionary Paradox: Can Macroevolution Sometimes Be so Fast to Pass Us By?Massimo Pigliucci - 2003 - Evolution 57 (7):1455-1464.
Medical Diagnostics with Nonparametric Allocation Rules.Norbert Victor - 1980 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 1 (1):85-94.
On the Limits of Quantitative Genetics for the Study of Phenotypic Evolution.Massimo Pigliucci & Carl D. Schlichting - 1997 - Acta Biotheoretica 45 (2):143-160.
Coordinating Perceptually Grounded Categories Through Language: A Case Study for Colour.Luc Steels & Tony Belpaeme - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):469-489.