Lying to Insurance Companies: The Desire to Deceive among Physicians and the Public

American Journal of Bioethics 4 (4):53-59 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study examines the public's and physicians' willingness to support deception of insurance companies in order to obtain necessary healthcare services and how this support varies based on perceptions of physicians' time pressures. Based on surveys of 700 prospective jurors and 1617 physicians, the public was more than twice as likely as physicians to sanction deception (26% versus 11%) and half as likely to believe that physicians have adequate time to appeal coverage decisions (22% versus 59%). The odds of public support for deception compared to that of physicians rose from 2.48 to 4.64 after controlling for differences in time perception. These findings highlight the ethical challenge facing physicians and patients in balancing patient advocacy with honesty in the setting of limited societal resources

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,119

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
67 (#254,779)

6 months
14 (#356,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Why Physicians Ought to Lie for Their Patients.Nicolas Tavaglione & Samia A. Hurst - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (3):4-12.
Why Physicians Should Not Lie for Their Patients.Robert M. Sade - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (3):17-19.
Truth and Consequences in an Era of “Unsurance”.Richard A. Demme - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (4):69-71.
Beyond the Lies: Solving the Problem.E. Haavi Morreim - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (4):61-63.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references