Does it Matter Whether Investigators Intend to Benefit Research Subjects?

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (4):353-370 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is widely agreed that clinical research should satisfy a number of ethical requirements. These include requirements to address a valuable question, to select subjects fairly, and to pose appropriate risks. In contrast, there remains considerable debate over the ethical relevance of investigator intentions: Does it matter ethically whether investigators intend to collect generalizable knowledge or to benefit subjects, or both? Some commentators do not mention investigator intentions when evaluating what makes clinical research ethical (Emanuel, Wendler, and Grady 2000). Others regard investigator intentions as central to the ethics of clinical research (Jonas 1969). These commentators argue that ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is payment a benefit?Alan Wertheimer - 2011 - Bioethics 27 (2):105-116.
The Exceptional Ethics of the Investigator-Subject Relationship.B. Sachs - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (1):64-80.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-02

Downloads
249 (#78,529)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references