Machinic Thinking

In Keith Ansell Pearson (ed.), Deleuze and Philosophy: The Difference Engineer. London, UK: pp. 211-227 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that the transcendence (most obviously theological) has skewed much of Western thinking by forcing material complexity to be interpreted as the intervention of something immaterial. Contemporary terms in the anglophone world that can play this role are: intentionality (privatised teleology), representation and semantics. Deleuze launches a powerful critique of residually theological reasoning that has wide application in both philosophy and science. This critique converges with and deepens, perhaps surprisingly for a French philosopher, similar critiques that are being offered today in evolutionary biology, cognitive science and robotics.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Machinic Assemblages.Peta Malins - 2004 - Janus Head 7 (1):84-104.
Mission Impossible? Thinking What Must be Thought in Heidegger and Deleuze.Corijn Van Mazijk - 2013 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 5 (2):336-354.
Thinking through theatre.Maaike Bleeker - 2009 - In Laura Cull (ed.), Deleuze and performance. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 157.
Traces of Identity In Deleuze’s Differential Ontology.Gavin Rae - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (1):86-105.
A Kantian stance on the intentional stance.Matthew Ratcliffe - 2001 - Biology and Philosophy 16 (1):29-52.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-31

Downloads
162 (#115,241)

6 months
59 (#72,828)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alistair Welchman
University of Texas at San Antonio

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references