A defense of stiffer penalties for hate crimes

Hypatia 21 (2):62-80 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: After defining a hate crime as an offense in which the criminal selects the victim at least in part because of an animus toward members of the group to which the victim belongs, this essay surveys the standard justifications for state punishment en route to defending the permissibility of imposing stiffer penalties for hate crimes. It also argues that many standard instances of rape and domestic battery are hate crimes and may be punished as such.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
173 (#108,098)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Wellman
Washington University in St. Louis

References found in this work

The Expressive Function of Punishment.Joel Feinberg - 1965 - The Monist 49 (3):397-423.

Add more references