Mind 113 (449):115-129 (2004)

Authors
Joan Weiner
Indiana University, Bloomington
Abstract
Why did Frege look for the foundations of arithmetic in logic? Robin Jeshion has argued against several proposed answers, mine among them, and offered one of her own. In response, I argue that (i) Jeshion's own interpretation does not work: it is unsupported by the text and fails to answer the question; (ii) while it is not my view that Frege is motivated solely by philosophical concerns, his motivation cannot be divorced from his belief that foundations for science must show whether its truths are analytic or synthetic, a priori or a posteriori; (iii) it must (for Frege) be evident from the content of a primitive truth to which of these categories the truth belongs.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/113.449.115
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,257
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Frege and the Paradox of Analysis.Michael Nelson - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (2):159-181.
Abstraction without exceptions.Luca Zanetti - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (10):3197-3216.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
57 ( #197,912 of 2,499,748 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,066 of 2,499,748 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes