Three Naturalistic Accounts of the Epistemology of Argument

Informal Logic 26 (1):63-89 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Three contrasting approaches to the epistemology of argument are presented. Each one is naturalistic, drawing upon successful practices as the basis for epistemological virtue. But each looks at very different sorts of practices and they differ greatly as to the manner with which relevant practices may be described. My own contribution relies on a metamathematical reconstruction of mature science, and as such, is a radical break with the usual approaches within the theory of argument

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Euthyphronic Problem for Kitcher’s Epistemology of Science.Jeffrey W. Roland - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):205-223.
Naturalistic Epistemology, Normativity, and Self.Joungbin Lim - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:171-182.
Was Macht Eine Erkenntnistheorie Naturalistisch?On what makes an epistemology naturalistic.Dirk Koppelberg - 1996 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 27 (1):71-90.
Recent Work on Naturalized Epistemology.James Maffie - 1990 - American Philosophical Quarterly 27 (4):281 - 293.
Epistemology dehumanized.Panayot Butchvarov - 2008 - In Quentin Smith (ed.), Epistemology: new essays. New York : Oxford University Press,: Oxford University Press. pp. 301.
Scientific Realism and Naturalistic Epistemology.Richard Boyd - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:613-662.
A platonist epistemology.Mark Balaguer - 1995 - Synthese 103 (3):303 - 325.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
67 (#232,601)

6 months
4 (#657,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?