The Hypothesis of Nash Equilibrium and Its Bayesian Justification

In Dag Prawitz & Dag Westerståhl (eds.), Logic and Philosophy of Science in Uppsala. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 245--264 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How does Bayesian reasoning support participation in a game's Nash equilibrium? This paper provides an answer.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The relevance of Nash equilibrium to psychiatric disorders.Tassos Patokos - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (4):245-258.
Maximin play in completely mixed strategic games.Vitaly Pruzhansky - 2013 - Theory and Decision 75 (4):543-561.
Probe and Adjust.Simon M. Huttegger - 2013 - Biological Theory 8 (2):195-200.
What is rational about Nash equilibria?Mathias Risse - 2000 - Synthese 124 (3):361 - 384.
An axiomatic analysis of the Nash equilibrium concept.Hannu Salonen - 1992 - Theory and Decision 33 (2):177-189.
Common Knowledge and Games with Perfect Information.Philip J. Reny - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:363 - 369.
Refinements of Nash Equilibrium: A critique.Robin Cubitt - 1989 - Theory and Decision 26 (2):107-131.
Games without rules.Flavio Menezes & John Quiggin - 2007 - Theory and Decision 63 (4):315-347.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
21 (#720,615)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Weirich
University of Missouri, Columbia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references