Science in Context 6 (2):555-567 (1993)
AbstractThe ArgumentThe thesis of the paper is that there is no “abuse” of science as suggested by the legend of Galileo but only a mutual opportunism characterizing the relation between science and politics.Any scientific research depends on the accessibility of its subject matter, plus material resources. The absence of internal constraints, the hunger for novelty, translate into a powerful drive to secure both. The coupling between science and politics in our time is based on a mutual dependence: resources and accessibility are exchanged for solutions to problems and legitimation.Scientific disciplines are highly sensitive to their environments with respect to the possibilities of extending their power of definition and of thereby obtaining resources. The ability of the sciences to expand their power of definition depends on the political “context of relevance.” The context, such as a socialist or fascist ideology, selects against certain sciences. But for a government to be able to favor one school at the expense of another there have to be competing factions within science, and their conflict has to be to some extent unresolved.Modern democratic systems differ from totalitarian ones insofar as their interest in science is ideologically vague and primarily economic in nature. This does not mean that the same mechanisms of mutual utilization do not operate.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Stages in the Empirical Programme of Relativism.Harry M. Collins - 1981 - Social Studies of Science 11:3-10.
Rasse, Blut Und Gene: Geschichte der Eugenik Und Rassenhygiene in Deutschland.Peter Weingart, Kurt Bayertz & Robert N. Proctor - 1989 - Journal of the History of Biology 22 (3):501-505.
Citations of this work
Reconfiguring the Centre: The Structure of Scientific Exchanges Between Colonial India and Europe.Dhruv Raina - 1996 - Minerva 34 (2):161-176.
Similar books and articles
From 'The Legend of Truth' to a 'True Legend:' Phases of Sartre's Development.I. Meszaros - 1975 - Télos 1975 (25):112-132.
The Legend of Feminism.Joyce C. Havstad & Iris M. Jahng - 2009 - In Luke Cuddy (ed.), The Legend of Zelda and Philosophy: I Link Thereforei Am. Open Court.
The Foundations of Political Science.John William Burgess - 1933 - New York: Columbia University Press.
On the Logical Positivists' Philosophy of Psychology: Laying a Legend to Rest.Sean Crawford - 2014 - In Maria Carla Galavotti, Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, Stephan Hartmann, Thomas Uebel & Marcel Weber (eds.), New Directions in Philosophy of Science. The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective Vol. 5. Springer. pp. 711-726.
Intimate Homicide and the Provocation Defence – Endangering Women? R V. Smith.Mandy Burton - 2001 - Feminist Legal Studies 9 (3):247-258.
The Legend of Zelda and Philosophy: I Link Therefore I Am.Luke Cuddy (ed.) - 2008 - Open Court.
The Advancement of Science. Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions.David Lamb - 1994 - Philosophical Books 35 (3):211-213.
The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions.José Antonio Díez Calzada - 1994 - Theoria 9 (1):212-216.