Dialectica 30 (2-3):255-259 (1976)

In his response to my article, “Historicism and Science: Thoughts on Quine”, Paul Bernays distinguishes between two aspects of the article: my criticism of Quine's theory of knowledge and my contention that the epistemological foundations of modern science lead to historicism. Bernays substantially accepts my criticism of Quine, particularly insofar as I reject Quine's behaviorism and “physicalism”. He opposes, however, my claim that historicism is implicit in the presuppositions of modern science. I argued that the historicism inherent in modern science is due to the essentially changeable character of modern science. Quine's theory of knowledge tacitly takes account of this changeable character a) through his view of sense experience as being constituted by posits, b) through his recognition that individual scientific statements are dependent upon a broad linguistic‐conceptual framework that is itself subject to change, and c) through his pragmatic conception of reason and the concomitant emphasis upon the criterion of simplicity.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/dltc.1976.30.issue-2-3
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Response to Bernays1.Raymond L. Weiss - 1976 - Dialectica 30 (2‐3):255-259.
Historicism, Entrenchment, and Conventionalism.Nathaniel Jason Goldberg - 2009 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (2):259-276.
Historicism and Science: Thoughts on Quine.Raymond L. Weiss - 1975 - Dialectica 29 (2‐3):157-165.
Understanding Others: Cultural Anthropology with Collingwood and Quine.Guiseppina D’Oro - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 7 (3):326-345.
Extensionalism and Scientific Theory in Quine’s Philosophy.Saloua Chatti - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):1 - 21.
Quine and Davidson: Two Naturalized Epistemologists.Roger F. Gibson - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (4):449 – 463.
Quine's Philosophy of Science.J. J. C. Smart - 1968 - Synthese 19 (1-2):3 - 13.
The Passing Show.William Gilbert Evans - 1984 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Quine's ‘Needlessly Strong’ Holism.Sander Verhaegh - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 61:11-20.
Quine's Argument From Despair.Sander Verhaegh - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (1):150-173.
Normativity in Quine's Naturalism: The Technology of Truth-Seeking? [REVIEW]Wybo Houkes - 2002 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (2):251-267.


Added to PP index

Total views
2 ( #1,447,603 of 2,506,366 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,366 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes