Responsible Management in Private Sector Nano Enterprises: Conversations with Lead Technologists and Managers [Book Review]
NanoEthics 7 (3):217-229 (2013)
AbstractThe aim was to learn about responsible management in private sector nano enterprises by telephone conversations with lead technologists and managers in companies in the US Midwest. The conversations took place between January and March of 2011. The marked increase starting in 2008 of prescriptive documents such as guidelines, codes of responsibility, and best practices in NanoEthicsBank offered an entry point for initiating the conversations. Had respondents noticed these documents and did they find them useful? Follow-up questions asked about the full life cycle of their products. The responses from 22 of the 25 organizations selected are categorized in 5 groups according to how they described their nano materials/business. A conception of responsible management in organizations is provided to underpin the analysis of the responses. This conception features virtues of concern, care, and foresight implied by a fundamental moral obligation. In the analysis, definitions from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the International Standards Organization (ISO) are used as a basis of comparison in assessing respondents’ claims. Two important gaps are identified. One gap is between actual practices and the prescriptive use of the conception of responsible management in organizations. The other gap is between the actual use of nano terminology and OECD definitions
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
“Ain’T No One Here But Us Social Forces”: Constructing the Professional Responsibility of Engineers. [REVIEW]Michael Davis - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):13-34.
Engineering Ethics Beyond Engineers' Ethics.Josep M. Basart & Montse Serra - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):179-187.
Editors' Overview: Moral Responsibility in Technology and Engineering.Neelke Doorn & Ibo van de Poel - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):1-11.
Practitioners' Views on Responsibility: Applying Nanoethics. [REVIEW]Rider W. Foley, Ira Bennett & Jameson M. Wetmore - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (3):231-241.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Public sector engagement with online identity management.D. Barnard-Wills & D. Ashenden - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):657-674.
Values That Create Value: Socially Responsible Business Practices in SMEs – Empirical Evidence From German Companies.Eva-Maria Hammann, André Habisch & Harald Pechlaner - 2009 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 18 (1):37-51.
Editors' Overview: Topics in the Responsible Management of Research Data.Joe Giffels, Sara H. Vollmer & Stephanie J. Bird - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):631-637.
Introducing Standards of Care in the Commercialization of Nanotechnology.Vivian Weil - 2006 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2):205-213.
From Red to Green: Towards the Environmental Management in the Country in Transition. [REVIEW]Iča Rojšek - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (1):37 - 50.
A Comparison of Business Ethics Commitment in Private and Public Sector Organizations in Sweden.Göran Svensson, Greg Wood & Michael Callaghan - 2010 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 19 (2):213-232.
Assessing the Accountability of Government-Sponsored Enterprises and Quangos.Rae André - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 97 (2):271 - 289.
Conversations About Responsible Nanoresearch.Kamilla Lein Kjølberg & Roger Strand - 2011 - NanoEthics 5 (1):99-113.
The Effect of Guanxi on Audit Quality in China.Jihong Liu, Yaping Wang & Liansheng Wu - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 103 (4):621-638.
The Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds: The Role of Fees and Management Companies. [REVIEW]Javier Gil-Bazo, Pablo Ruiz-Verdú & André A. P. Santos - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 94 (2):243 - 263.