Paradoxes solved by simple relevance criteria

Logique Et Analyse 29 (113):3-40 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Semantic Paradoxes and Transparent Intensional Logic.Jiri Raclavsky - 2012 - The Logica Yearbook 2011 (College Publications):239-252.
Relevant deduction.Gerhard Schurz - 1991 - Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):391 - 437.
The paradoxes of confirmation and the nature of natural laws.L. Goddard - 1977 - Philosophical Quarterly 27 (107):97-113.
Scientific value.Lars Bergström - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (3):189-202.
Paradoxes of intensionality.Dustin Tucker & Richmond H. Thomason - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):394-411.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-24

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Deontic logic.Paul McNamara - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Relevant deduction.Gerhard Schurz - 1991 - Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):391 - 437.
Understanding epistemic relevance.Luciano Floridi - 2008 - Erkenntnis 69 (1):69-92.
Relevance, relatedness and restricted set theory.Barry Smith - 1991 - In Georg Schurz & Georg Jakob Wilhelm Dorn (eds.), Advances in Scientific Philosophy. Amsterdam: Rodopi. pp. 45-56.

View all 24 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references