Natural Law, Property, and Redistribution

Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (1):165 - 180 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In his essay "Natural Law, Property, and Justice," B. Andrew Lustig argues for what he calls "significant correspondences" between John Locke's theory of property and scholastic theories of property on the one hand, and between Locke's theory and contemporary Catholic social teaching on the other. These correspondences, Lustig claims, establish an intellectual "tradition of property in common." I argue that linking Aquinas--even via Locke--to the redistributivism of contemporary Catholic social teaching requires distorting his political theory. This distortion, I argue, obscures the possibility of using Aquinas's political theory as a basis for radical social criticism.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,271

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A discourse on property: John Locke and his adversaries.James Tully - 1980 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Are PSI Effects Natural? A Preliminary Investigation.George I. Mavrodes - 1995 - Darshana International 35 (3/139):48 - 57.
The limits of lockean rights in property.Gopal Sreenivasan - 1995 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Justice and the Initial Acquisition of Property.John T. Sanders - 1987 - Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 10 (2):367-99.
Property and Justice.J. W. Harris - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
De Re Modality and the New Essentialism: A Dilemma.Paul Thom - 2003 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 44 (4):189-199.


Added to PP

39 (#395,876)

6 months
4 (#797,377)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Weithman
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references