Making sense of scientists’ responsibilities at the interface of science and society: Commentary on “six domains of research ethics”
Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):223-227 (2002)
AbstractAs Kenneth Pimple points out, scientists’ responsibilities to the larger society have received less attention than ethical issues internal to the practice of science. Yet scientists and specialists who study science have begun to provide analyses of the foundations and scope of scientsts’ responsibilities to society. An account of contributions from Kristen Shrader-Frechette, Melanie Leitner, Ullica Segerstråle, John Ahearne, Helen Longino, and Carl Cranor offers work on scientists’ social responsibilities upon which to build.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Six Domains of Research Ethics: A Heuristic Framework for the Responsible Conduct of Research.Kenneth D. Pimple - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):191-205.
Ethics of Scientific Research.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1999 - Ethics and the Environment 4 (2):241-245.
Book Review:Ethics of Scientific Research. Kristin Shrader-Frechette. [REVIEW]Vivian Weil - 1996 - Ethics 106 (4):879-.
Citations of this work
Editors' Overview Perspectives on Teaching Social Responsibility to Students in Science and Engineering.Henk Zandvoort, Tom Børsen, Michael Deneke & Stephanie J. Bird - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (4):1413-1438.
Philosophy of Technology and Macro-Ethics in Engineering.Wha-Chul Son - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):405-415.
Health Incentive Research and Social Justice: Does the Risk of Long Term Harms to Systematically Disadvantaged Groups Bear Consideration?Verina Wild & Bridget Pratt - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (3):150-156.
Science Outside the Lab: Helping Graduate Students in Science and Engineering Understand the Complexities of Science Policy.Michael J. Bernstein, Kiera Reifschneider, Ira Bennett & Jameson M. Wetmore - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (3):861-882.
The Need for Topically Focused Efforts to Deal with the Long-Term Social Implications of Research.Frazier Benya - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (5):19-20.
Similar books and articles
Responsibilities of Scientists and Engineers: Theory and Practice.Stephanie J. Bird - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):130-130.
The Social Responsibilities of Biological Scientists.Stanley Joel Reiser & Ruth E. Bulger - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):137-143.
Ethical Responsibilities of Nanotechnology Researchers: A Short Guide. [REVIEW]Robert McGinn - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (1):1-12.
An Ethics of Expertise Based on Informed Consent.Kevin C. Elliott - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4):637-661.
Teaching Social Responsibility: The Manhattan Project: Commentary on “Six Domains of Research Ethics”.Penny J. Gilmer & Michael DuBois - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):206-210.
Speak No Evil: Scientists, Responsibility, and the Public Understanding of Science. [REVIEW]Nicholas G. Evans - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (3):215-220.
Making Sense of Science: Understanding the Social Study of Science.Steven Yearley - 2005 - Sage Publications.
Four Observations About “Six Domains of Research Ethics”.Edward J. Hackett - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):211-214.
Exploring a Moral Landscape: Genetic Science and Ethics.Barbara Nicholas - 2001 - Hypatia 16 (1):45-63.