Matrix-based logic for application in physics

Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (1):132-163 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper offers a matrix-based logic (relevant matrix quantum physics) for propositions which seems suitable as an underlying logic for empirical sciences and especially for quantum physics. This logic is motivated by two criteria which serve to clean derivations of classical logic from superfluous redundancies and uninformative complexities. It distinguishes those valid derivations (inferences) of classical logic which contain superfluous redundancies and complexities and are in this sense from those which are or in the sense of allowing only the most informative consequences in the derivations. The latter derivations are strictly valid in RMQ, whereas the former are only materially valid. RMQ is a decidable matrix calculus which possesses a semantics and has the finite model property. It is shown in the paper how RMQ by its strictly valid derivations can avoid the difficulties with commensurability, distributivity, and Bell's inequalities when it is applied to quantum physics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Matrix logic and mind: a probe into a unified theory of mind and matter.August Stern - 1992 - New York: Distributors for the U.S. and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
Matrix logic.August Stern - 1988 - New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier.
The quantum brain: theory and implications.August Stern - 1994 - New York: North-Holland/Elsevier.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-05-29

Downloads
59 (#267,103)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Problems of axiomatizing religion.Paul Weingartner - 2021 - Studies in East European Thought 74 (2):149-163.
The Need for Pluralism of Causality.Paul Weingartner - 2016 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 25 (4):461-498.
Classicality and Bell’s theorem.Márton Gömöri & Carl Hoefer - 2023 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (3):1-24.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Logic, semantics, metamathematics.Alfred Tarski - 1956 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press. Edited by John Corcoran & J. H. Woodger.
Proof theory.Gaisi Takeuti - 1975 - New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
On the theory of inconsistent formal systems.Newton C. A. Costa - 1972 - Recife,: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Instituto de Matemática.

View all 24 references / Add more references