Inclusive Ends, Dominant Ends, and Politics

Process Studies 40 (2):260-278 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I have argued elsewhere that the overall method that is required in liberal political philosophy is that of reflective equilibrium and that this method can be best understood in processual terms. In the present article I try to show how neoclassical (and other) theists can bring their convictions to bear in a politically liberal society, within the confines of this method, in a rational (rather than irrational or mad) manner.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Inclusive Ends, Dominant Ends, and Politics.Daniel Dombrowski - 2011 - Process Studies 40 (2):260-278.
Inclusive Ends, Dominant Ends, and Politics.Daniel Dombrowski - 2011 - Process Studies 40 (2):260-278.
Response: A Defense of Pluhar.Daniel Dombrowski - 1991 - Between the Species 7 (3):4.
A Response to Deckers.Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2011 - Journal of Animal Ethics 1 (2):210-214.
Response to Boulting.Daniel Dombrowski - 2005 - Process Studies 34 (1):136-140.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
25 (#598,332)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Weithman
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references