Are there ultimate simples?

Philosophy of Science 2 (4):387-399 (1935)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the course of modern philosophy, there have been several attempts to demonstrate the existence of ultimately simple objects by purely logical methods. One of the most recent of such attempts forms part of the foundation of Wittgenstein's logical doctrine. As Wittgenstein has, until quite recently, been considered the authoritative source of Logical Positivism, an examination of his supposed demonstration of logical simples is propaedeutic to an evaluation of the method of the school.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Against maxcon simples.Kris McDaniel - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):265 – 275.
The momentariness of simples.Roy W. Perrett - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (3):435-445.
Descartes' compositional theory of mental representation.David Landy - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):214-231.
Causes, proximate and ultimate.Richard C. Francis - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (4):401-415.
Extended simples.Kris McDaniel - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (1):131 - 141.
Constituted simples?Jens Johansson - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (1):87-89.
Conceiving simple experiences.Michael V. Antony - 2001 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 22 (3):263-86.
Simples and the possibility of discrete space.Neal A. Tognazzini - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (1):117 – 128.
A tale of two simples.Joshua Spencer - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (2):167 - 181.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#379,248)

6 months
10 (#187,567)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references