Attentional processes along a composite stimulus continuum during free-operant summation

Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (1p1):22 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0028057

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Stimulus control during the summation of conditioned suppression.Stanley J. Weiss & Henry H. Emurian - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (2):204.
The magnitude of binocular summation as a function of the method of stimulus presentation.George Collier & Philip Kubzansky - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (4):355.
Binocular summation in scotopic vision.D. Shaad - 1935 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (4):391.
A further application of composite-stimulus control in additive summation.Shih-Yuan Tsai & Stanley J. Weiss - 1977 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 9 (3):169-172.
Facilitation of human operant responding by stimuli which precede aversive events.Rodney A. Poetter & Paul Lewis - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (2):382.
Using a clicker and a tone CS to suppress free-operant avoidance behavior.Albert E. Roberts - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (2):175-177.
Stimulus generalization after training on three stimuli: A test of the summation hypothesis.Harry I. Kalish & Norman Guttman - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (4):268.
The influence of two variables upon the establishment of a secondary reinforcer for operant responses.Philip J. Bersh - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (1):62.
Subjectively equated stimulus intensities and autonomic reactivity.Elna Hayward White - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (3):297.
Discriminative conditioning. II. Effects of a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus upon a subsequently established operant response. [REVIEW]William K. Estes - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (2):173.
Relation between stimulus intensity and operant response rate as a function of discrimination training and drive.Jeffrey A. Gray - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (1):9.
Supplementary report: Stimulus generalization gradients along a luminosity continuum.Gary Olson & Richard A. King - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (4):414.
Summation relations and portions of stuff.Maureen Donnelly & Thomas Bittner - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (2):167 - 185.
Varied functions of punishment in differential instrumental conditioning.George T. Taylor - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (2):298.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
15 (#889,556)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Stimulus compounding in pigeons.Carolyn K. Long & Joseph D. Allen - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 4 (2):95-97.
Free-operant compounding of low-rate stimuli.Stanley J. Weiss - 1977 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 10 (2):115-117.
Response summation and noncontingent reinforcement.Donald Meltzer & Bruce Niebuhr - 1981 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 18 (5):271-274.
Response summation in the pigeon.Donald Meltzer & Robert J. Hamm - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (6):515-518.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references