Are Contradictions Believable?

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):42-49 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A number of philosophers deny that contradictions can be believed. Are they correct? In this note, I show that even in quite weak logics, on pain of inconsistency, if there are false beliefs, either there are propositions which are true but unbelievable or contradictions are believable. Since the antecedent clearly holds, I offer some considerations in favor of the latter disjunct. Objections and variants of the main argument are considered.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Modal Logic of Metaphor.Krister Segerberg - 2011 - Studia Logica 99 (1-3):337-347.
Moore’s Paradox, Introspection and Doxastic Logic.Adam Rieger - 2015 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (4):215-227.
On Beliefs.Frode Bjørdal - 1996 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 1:79-94.
Contradictions, Objects, and Belief.Srećko Kovač - 2007 - In Jean-Yves Béziau & Alexandre Costa-Leite (eds.), Perspectives on Universal Logic. Monza: Polimetrica. pp. 417-434.
Common belief with the logic of individual belief.Giacomo Bonanno - 2000 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 46 (1):49-52.
The Modal Logic of Bayesian Belief Revision.Zalán Gyenis, Miklós Rédei & William Brown - 2019 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 48 (5):809-824.
From BDI and stit to bdi-stit logic.Caroline Semmling & Heinrich Wansing - 2008 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 17 (1-2):185-207.
Irrevocable Belief Revision in Dynamic Doxastic Logic.Krister Segerberg - 1998 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 39 (3):287-306.
A Dialectical Contradiction is Not "A and Not-A". Du Ruji - 1982 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 13 (4):3-8.
A Modal Logic of Information.Krystyna Misiuna - 2012 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 21 (1):33-51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-25

Downloads
72 (#224,393)

6 months
13 (#184,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yale Weiss
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

Risky belief.Martin Smith - 2022 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 106 (3):597-611.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The paradox of the preface.David C. Makinson - 1965 - Analysis 25 (6):205-207.
Logic for equivocators.David Lewis - 1982 - Noûs 16 (3):431-441.
A logical analysis of some value concepts.Frederic Fitch - 1963 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 28 (2):135-142.
``The Paradox of the Preface".D. C. Makinson - 1964 - Analysis 25 (6):205-207.
Vagueness and Contradiction.Roy Sorensen - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):695-703.

View all 10 references / Add more references