Are Contradictions Believable?

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):42-49 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A number of philosophers deny that contradictions can be believed. Are they correct? In this note, I show that even in quite weak logics, on pain of inconsistency, if there are false beliefs, either there are propositions which are true but unbelievable or contradictions are believable. Since the antecedent clearly holds, I offer some considerations in favor of the latter disjunct. Objections and variants of the main argument are considered.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-25

Downloads
96 (#217,187)

6 months
11 (#322,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yale Weiss
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

Risky belief.Martin Smith - 2023 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 106 (3):597-611.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The paradox of the preface.David Makinson - 1965 - Analysis 25 (6):205.
Logic for equivocators.David K. Lewis - 1982 - Noûs 16 (3):431-441.
``The Paradox of the Preface".D. C. Makinson - 1964 - Analysis 25 (6):205-207.
A logical analysis of some value concepts.Frederic Fitch - 1963 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 28 (2):135-142.
Vagueness and Contradiction.Roy Sorensen - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):695-703.

View all 10 references / Add more references