Journal of Business Ethics 58 (4):281-294 (2005)
AbstractThis paper reports on the results from two studies that were conducted eight years apart with different respondents. The studies examined the role of the Mere Exposure Effect on ethical tolerance or acceptability of particular business decisions. The results from Study 1 show there is a significant difference in ethical judgment for 12 out of 16 vignettes between those who have been exposed to such situations compared to those who have not been exposed to them. In those 12 situations, those who have been exposed to such situations adopted a more tolerant stance toward the ethically questionable behavior. The results from Study 2 show there is a significant difference in ethical judgment for 9 out of 16 vignettes between those who have been exposed to such situations compared to those who have not been exposed to them. Again, in those nine situations, those who have been exposed to such situations adopted a more tolerant stance toward the ethically questionable behavior. Interestingly, the 9 situations in Study 2 were 9 of the 12 situations found to be significant in Study 1, and in the same direction, suggesting that we have found consistency in our findings and support for the Mere Exposure Effect. Implications are provided for both higher education and practitioners.
Similar books and articles
Implicit Preferences: The Role(s) of Familiarity in the Structural Mere Exposure Effect.D. Zizak - 2004 - Consciousness and Cognition 13 (2):336-362.
Perceptual Learning, the Mere Exposure Effect and Aesthetic Antirealism.Bence Nanay - 2017 - Leonardo 50:58-63.
Experimental Dissociations Between Memory Measures: Influence of Retrieval Strategies.Sylvie Willems & Martial Der Lindevann - 2009 - Consciousness and Cognition 18 (1):39-55.
The Mere Exposure Phenomenon: A Lingering Melody by Robert Zajonc.Richard L. Moreland & Sascha Topolinski - 2010 - Emotion Review 2 (4):329-339.
The Structural Mere Exposure Effect: The Dual Role of Familiarity.D. M. Zizak & A. S. Reber - 2004 - Consciousness and Cognition 13:336-362.
Eliminating the Mere Exposure Effect Through Changes in Context Between Exposure and Test.Daniel de Zilva, Chris J. Mitchell & Ben R. Newell - 2013 - Cognition and Emotion 27 (8):1345-1358.
The Mere Exposure Effect is Differentially Sensitive to Different Judgment Tasks.John G. Seamon, Patricia A. McKenna & Neil Binder - 1998 - Consciousness and Cognition 7 (1):85-102.
Do Role Models Matter? An Investigation of Role Modeling as an Antecedent of Perceived Ethical Leadership.Michael E. Brown & Linda K. Treviño - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 122 (4):1-12.
The Construction of Political Tolerance: A Sociology of Knowledge Approach.Gerson Moreno-Riano - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Cincinnati
Reflexii Neortodoxe Despre Toleranta/ Unorthodox Thoughts on Tolerance.Camil Muresanu - 2002 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 1 (3):17-21.
Consciousness Organizes More Than Itself: Findings From Subliminal Mere Exposure Research.Robert F. Bornstein - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):332-333.
The Impact of Paternalistic Leadership on Ethical Climate: The Moderating Role of Trust in Leader. [REVIEW]Ayşe Begüm Ötken & Tuna Cenkci - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 108 (4):525 - 536.
The Mere Exposure Effect and Recognition Memory.Man-Ying Wang & Hsio-Chuan Chang - 2004 - Cognition and Emotion 18 (8):1055-1078.
Tolerance Effect in Categorisation with Vague Predicates.Minyao Huang - 2013 - Pragmatics and Cognition 21 (2):340-358.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Ethical Judgments in Business Ethics Research: Definition, and Research Agenda.John R. Sparks & Yue Pan - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 91 (3):405-418.
The Effects of Ethical Codes on Ethical Perceptions of Actions Toward Stakeholders.Joseph A. McKinney, Tisha L. Emerson & Mitchell J. Neubert - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 97 (4):505 - 516.
Transition Ethics: A Comparison of Ukrainian and United States Business Professionals.Olena Vynoslavska, Joseph A. McKinney, Carlos W. Moore & Justin G. Longenecker - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 61 (3):283-299.
Using the PET Assessment Instrument to Help Students Identify Factors That Could Impede Moral Behavior.Debra R. Comer & Gina Vega - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (2):129 - 145.
Using the PET Assessment Instrument to Help Students Identify Factors That Could Impede Moral Behavior.Debra R. Comer & Gina Vega - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (2):129-145.
References found in this work
The Consciousness of Self.William James - 1890 - In The Principles of Psychology. Harvard University Press.
A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making.Michael Bommer, Clarence Gratto, Jerry Gravander & Mark Tuttle - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (4):265 - 280.
Emotion and Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations.Alice Gaudine & Linda Thorne - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 31 (2):175 - 187.