Environmental Ethics 23 (3):275-286 (2001)
Abstract |
René Descartes is often thought to have exerted a pernicious influence on our views concerning the relationship of humans to the environment. The view that because animals are machines, “thoughtless brutes,” they have no moral standing, and we thus have a right to use them to further our own interests, is attributed to him. A celebrated passage from the Discourse on Method adds fuel to the view that he subscribes to the “dominion” theory. I argue that this picture is misleading and unfair. Descartes does not hold the dominion theory, and there is evidence that he accords animals (and plants) moral standing. Most importantly, Descartes holds that it is a human good to subordinate one’s interests to those of the larger universe. He can, in fact, be seen as a forerunner of modern ecocentrism
|
Keywords | Applied Philosophy General Interest |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 0163-4275 |
DOI | 10.5840/enviroethics200123316 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Descartes on Animals Revisited.Michael R. Miller - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Research 38:89-114.
Similar books and articles
A Critique of Mary Anne Warren’s Weak Animal Rights View.Aaron Simmons - 2007 - Environmental Ethics 29 (3):267-278.
Machines, Sentience, and the Scope of Morality.Frederik Kaufman - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (1):57-70.
Callicott and the Metaphysical Basis of Ecocentric Morality.James Fieser - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (2):171-180.
Intrinsic Value, Moral Standing, and Species.Rick O’Neil - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (1):45-52.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
31 ( #368,761 of 2,508,046 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,508,046 )
2009-01-28
Total views
31 ( #368,761 of 2,508,046 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,508,046 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads