Cartesian Environmental Ethics

Environmental Ethics 23 (3):275-286 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

René Descartes is often thought to have exerted a pernicious influence on our views concerning the relationship of humans to the environment. The view that because animals are machines, “thoughtless brutes,” they have no moral standing, and we thus have a right to use them to further our own interests, is attributed to him. A celebrated passage from the Discourse on Method adds fuel to the view that he subscribes to the “dominion” theory. I argue that this picture is misleading and unfair. Descartes does not hold the dominion theory, and there is evidence that he accords animals (and plants) moral standing. Most importantly, Descartes holds that it is a human good to subordinate one’s interests to those of the larger universe. He can, in fact, be seen as a forerunner of modern ecocentrism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Machines, Sentience, and the Scope of Morality.Frederik Kaufman - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (1):57-70.
Locke’s View of Dominion.Kathleen M. Squadrito - 1979 - Environmental Ethics 1 (3):255-262.
Intrinsic Value, Moral Standing, and Species.Rick O’Neil - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (1):45-52.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
43 (#361,277)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Cecilia Lim
National University of Singapore

Citations of this work

Descartes on Animals Revisited.Michael R. Miller - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Research 38:89-114.
Los límites de Descartes en el dominio de la naturaleza.Sergio García Rodríguez - 2021 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 54 (2):471-488.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references