1. Preface Preface (pp. i-ii)

Philosophy of Science 72 (5):687-698 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The study of similarity is fundamental to biological inquiry. Many homology concepts have been formulated that function successfully to explain similarity in their native domains, but fail to provide an overarching account applicable to variably interconnected and independent areas of biological research despite the monistic standpoint from which they originate. The use of multiple, explicitly articulated homology concepts, applicable at different levels of the biological hierarchy, allows a more thorough investigation of the nature of biological similarity. Responsible epistemological pluralism as advocated herein is generative of fruitful and innovative biological research, and is appropriate given the metaphysical pluralism that underpins all of biology.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,605

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

"Rethinking" the preface of the tractatus.Bruce Howes - 2006 - Philosophical Investigations 30 (1):3–24.
A Preface to the'Preface'.Finn Frandsen - 1999 - Kierkegaardiana 20:7.
The paradox of the preface.John L. Pollock - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (2):246-258.
Preface.Ervin Laszlo - 2014 - World Futures 70 (1):1-1.


Added to PP

5 (#1,295,374)

6 months
4 (#248,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Axel Gelfert
Technische Universität Berlin
Gry Oftedal
University of Oslo
Robert Bishop
University of Maryland, College Park
2 more

Citations of this work

A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics.Olimpia Lombardi & Mario Castagnino - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (2):380-443.
What could be worse than the butterfly effect?Robert C. Bishop - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):pp. 519-547.
‘A matter of so great importance to my health’: Alimentary knowledge in practice.Sara Pennell - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (2):418-424.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references