An empirical challenge to dissatisfaction theodicy

Sophia 44 (2):197-203 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some philosophers of religion claim that one reason God permits suffering is to make people dissatisfied with their lives so they will turn to him. That theodicy is inadequate because 1) that strategy of behavior modification constitutes punishment (in the psychologists’ sense), and 2) punishment is not the most effective strategy of behavior modification. Since God can be expected to use the most effective strategy available to him, such a theodicy is inadequate.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,912

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theodicy, Our Well-Being, and God's Rights.Richard Swinburne - 1995 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 38 (1-3):75 - 91.
Does theism need a theodicy?Richard Swinburne - 1988 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):287 - 311.
A Nietzschean theodicy.Carol A. Kates - 2004 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 55 (2):69-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
54 (#229,657)

6 months
2 (#319,667)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Webb
Texas Tech University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Problem of Evil.Eleonore Stump - 1985 - Faith and Philosophy 2 (4):392-423.
The Problem of Pain.C. S. Lewis - 1944 - New York: Macmillan.
The Problem of Pain.C. Lewis - 1945 - Philosophical Review 54:626.

Add more references