Truth, Art, and Knowledge (A commentary on James O YoungÂ's Art and Knowledge)


While much of James O. Young’s Art and Knowledge is devoted to showing how works of art might be of cognitive value, we will focus on a prior claim, defended in the first chapter of Art and Knowledge, that “art” ought to be defined such that only works with cognitive value count as artworks. We begin by noting that it is not very clear—despite the considerable attention Young devotes to the matter—just what it is for an artwork to have cognitive value. If by this claim he means only that we can learn something from a work, then the claim is trivial. We might learn from Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain, for example, that a urinal can become an artwork. But Young assumes that if Fountain is a work of art, then some works of art do not have cognitive value. So he must have a richer, narrower conception of cognitive value in mind. For the moment let us not worry what this richer, narrower conception of cognitive value is. Rather, let us just assume, along with Young, that Fountain does not have cognitive value. Why, then, is this not a counterexample to Young’s claim that “art” ought to be defined such that only works with cognitive value counts as artworks? Shouldn’t we define “art,” if we are going to define it, such that all and only works of art count as art? Why ought we adopt a definition of something which excludes from the category being defined things that, on the definer’s own grounds, are properly within that category. Surely, for any definiendum the definiens ought to pick out all and only those things that have the necessary and sufficient properties for being labeled by the definiendum.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,213

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Trying to Define Art as the Sum of the Arts.Stephen Davies - 2008 - Pazhouhesh Nameh-E Farhangestan-E Honar (Research Journal of the Iranian Academy of the Arts) 8:12–23.
World as Art.Stephen David Ross - 2009 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:107-142.
An Introduction to Art.Todd Parker - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (1):122-123.
A Portrait of the Artist as an Aesthetic Expert.Christy Mag Uidhir & Cameron Buckner - 2014 - In Gregory Currie, Matthew Kieran & Aaron Meskin (eds.), Aesthetics and the Sciences. Oxford University Press.
The Overlooked Work of Art in “the Origin of the Work of Art”.K. Gover - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (2):143-153.
Conceptual Art Is Not What It Seems.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2007 - In Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.), Philosophy and Conceptual Art. Oxford University Press.
Hermeneutical Circle in the Understanding of Art.Suhhyun Park - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 21:45-52.
How a Map Works in the Land Arts.Sukyung Chung - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 12:9-17.
Are There Counterexamples to Aesthetic Theories of Art?Nick Zangwill - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):111–118.
Music, Art, and Metaphysics.Jerrold Levinson - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
A Functional View of Artistic Evaluation.Jonathan Gilmore - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (2):289-305.


Added to PP

47 (#246,481)

6 months
1 (#414,449)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sheldon Wein
Saint Mary's University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references