Medicaid, Work, and the Courts: Reigning in HHS Overreach

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (4):887-891 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Work requirements are the centerpiece of HHS's Trump Administration strategy to undo the ACA expansion for low income working age adults. This article examines the June 29, 2018 trial court opinion in Stewart v. Azar which held that HHS's approval of Kentucky's Section 1115 work demonstration was “arbitrary and capricious.” The purpose of Medicaid is to provide health coverage and HHS may not ignore the loss of coverage that will result from a work requirement.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Medicaid Waivers: Courts Must Step in When the Exception Becomes the Rule.Leonardo Cuello - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (4):892-896.
In Defence of the ACA's Medicaid Expansion.Ishani Maitra & Brian Weatherson - 2013 - Public Affairs Quarterly 27 (3):267-288.
The Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Medicaid Focused Insurers in California.Michael J. McCue - 2015 - Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing 52:004695801559596.
Is Health Care Spending Higher under Medicaid or Private Insurance?Jack Hadley & John Holahan - 2003 - Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing 40 (4):323-342.
Medicaid physician fees and ambulatory care of Medicaid patients.S. L. Decker - 2009 - Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing 46 (3):291-304.
A Challenge to the Reigning Theory of the Just War.Christian Barry - 2011 - International Affairs 87 (2):457-466.
Public images and understandings of courts.James L. Gibson - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press.
Trial courts and adjudication.Sharyn Roach Anleu & Kathy Mack - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press.
Courts and Comparative Law.Mads Tønnesson Andenæs & Duncan Fairgrieve (eds.) - 2015 - Oxford University Press UK.
How International Courts Enhance Their Legitimacy.Shai Dothan - 2013 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 14 (2):455-478.
The Australian Judiciary.Enid Campbell & H. P. Lee - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-12

Downloads
18 (#808,169)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references