The McKinsey axiom is not compact

Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1230-1238 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A maximal bounded forcing axiom.David Asperó - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (1):130-142.
On measurable limits of compact cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1675-1688.
Strong analogues of Martin's axiom imply axiom R.Robert E. Beaudoin - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (1):216-218.
McKinsey-brown survives.Harold W. Noonan - 2000 - Analysis 60 (4):353-356.
The McKinsey axiom is not canonical.Robert Goldblatt - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (2):554-562.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
58 (#265,779)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Canonicity for intensional logics without iterative axioms.Timothy J. Surendonk - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (4):391-409.
Intentional identity revisited.Ahti Pietarinen - 2010 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (2):147-188.
Canonicity for intensional logics with even axioms.Timothy J. Surendonk - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1141-1156.
Uncompactness of Stit Logics Containing Generalized Refref Conditionals.Ming Xu - 1998 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 39 (4):485-506.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An incomplete logic containing S.Kit Fine - 1974 - Theoria 40 (1):23-29.

Add more references