Abstract

Heidegger's criticism of Husserl's response to this paper for the understanding of intentionality and the theory of orientation by the departure of the limited depth of Husserl's phenomenological method 'overhang' of meaning, the transcendental self is not to demonstrate for a "No interest of spectators." As for the general said: convert from the natural attitude on the attitude of transcendental object is the "what" questions that translate into on the "how", the paper further stressed that "how" question does not replace, "What "The problem, simply by the phenomenological" how "a series of reflection, given the infinite wealth of meaning to the essence of things as" what "up. We see this new "what" is like a work of art, the phenomenological method is like an art activity. This view is from Kant's' Critique of Judgement "in the United States objects to the conditions attributed to" reflect judgments "be inspired. We really see this in Heidegger, "phenomenological psychology" as an art scholar who, as Husserl's late for the life of the world by the transcendental subject and its infinite reflection "how" to the final show as a pure phenomenological psychology, the main theme of the transcendent nature of the "what" the rich meaning, it is Husserl's "phenomenological psychology" We also considered an art. This article starts from a reaction on Heidegger's critiques of Husserl's conception of the intentionality and his theoretical position, then investigates with greater depth Husserl's phenomenological method "epoché", and highlights that the transcendental ego originally is not "an uninterested observer". For viewing that from the natural to the transcendental attitude the question of "what" is transformed into the question of "how" regarding the object in general, we point out the question of "how" by no means replaces the question of "what". Phenomenology basically aims to endow the essence of matter as "what" through a series of reflections on its "how" with boundless meanings. We estimate this new form of "what" as a work of art, and the phenomenological method as an activity of art. This insight is illuminated by Kant when he in "Critique of Judgment" discusses the possibility of a beautiful object to be obtained through a Reflective Judgment. We see some scholar thinks Heidegger's authentic phenomenological psychology like an art. The later Husserl shows his mature phenomenological psychology , as he acquires the rich meanings of the essence of the transcendental subjectivity as the topics of the pure phenomenological psychology through a series of reflections on the "how" of the Life-world and the transcendental subjectivity. So Husserl's phenomenological psychology can be understood as a form of art.