Heng dao and appropriation of nature - a hermeneutical interpretation of laozi

Asian Philosophy 10 (2):149 – 163 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has a hermeneutical interpretation of 'heng', one key word in the Laozi. The term 'heng' was not known until 1973 when the two silk manuscripts of the Laozi were unearthed in China. On the base of a reintroduction of heng into the text and of my philosophical reading of the Laozi's concept of 'heng', I argue for an alternative interpretation of dao as heng dao. I suggest that heng dao is neither a metaphysical substance nor mystical nothingness. It is rather the differentiated appropriation of nature and life itself as experienced in the everyday.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Laozi’s Dao—An Attempt to Make Philosophy Speak Chinese.Ruohui Li - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (1):1-19.
Governing Through the Dao: A Non-Anarchistic Interpretation of the Laozi. [REVIEW]Alex Feldt - 2010 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (3):323-337.
The laozi code.Phan Chánh Công - 2007 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (3):239-262.
Lévinas's phenomenology of sensibility and time in his early period.Wang Heng - 2008 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 35 (s1):105-121.
Heng and temporality of Dao: Laozi and Heidegger. [REVIEW]Qingjie Wang - 2001 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 1 (1):55-71.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#370,011)

6 months
10 (#251,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Qingjie Wang
Chinese University of Hong Kong