From Being-with to Ereignis: Heidegger's Theory of Community

Dissertation, Tulane University (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The primary task of my dissertation is to analyze Heidegger's thought of "community" from his early concept of "being-in-the-world-with-one-another" to his later concept of Ereignis , with an aim to show how Heidegger's thought of community constitutes one of the most important aspects of his inquiry into being. ;First of all, I use Heidegger's criticism of both Kant's attempt of proving the existence of the external world and Husserl's transcendental intentionality to clarify how Heidegger's concept of Dasein as "being-in-the-world-with-one-another" distinguishes itself from those philosophies of subjectivity in the modern history and thus starts a new, post-subjective way of thinking. In defense of my interpretation I argue with some American pragmatists who misinterpreted Heidegger's Dasein as a "practical agent" or "subject of action," and with Jurgen Habermas who claimed that there is an essential inconsistency between Heidegger's anti-subjective "world-analysis" and his subjective "who-analysis." ;Secondly, I try to show that Heidegger' s thought of "community" culminates in his later concept of Ereignis, which is based on his understanding of the essence of truth as untruth, i.e., Geheimnis , and is interpreted as both "belonging-together" and "setting-apart-from-one-another" . Compared with the concept of "being-in-the-world-with-one-another," which is still Dasein oriented, the concept of Ereignis is being oriented. Because of this, I argue that Heidegger's Ereignis as community is not only a "human community" but also a "cosmo-logos community," which is a humanistic but anti-anthropocentric fourfold . ;Finally, I present some critical discussions of Heidegger's ontological holism, of the "holy" character of Heidegger' s cosmo-logos community, and a brief comparison between Heidegger's and the traditional Confucian idea of the relation between individual human beings, nature and community. By doing these, I attempt to show both the limitations of and some future possibilities for enrichment of Heidegger's way of thinking of community

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Individual and Community in Dewey and Heidegger.David Carl Jacobson - 1992 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook
Heidegger and the Question of Community.James Patrick Gilbert-Walsh - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Rethinking selfhood: From enowning.Francois Raffoul - 2007 - Research in Phenomenology 37 (1):75-94.
Reading in Ereignis.Ryan S. Hellmers - 2008 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):133-162.
Heidegger, Politic, Ethic.Derda Küçükalp - forthcoming - Felsefe Dünyasi:119-136.
Ereignis: Heidegger's Path.Leslie C. Miller - 2004 - Dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University
A Regional Thanatology: Hegel, Heidegger, and Death.Brent Allen Adkins - 2002 - Dissertation, Loyola University of Chicago
Seinsverlassenheit in the later philosophy of Heidegger.S. L. Bartky - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):74 – 88.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Qingjie Wang
Chinese University of Hong Kong

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references