But to Do Right... Why the Language of 'Rights' Does Not Do Justice to Justice

Studies in Christian Ethics 23 (2):138-146 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The essay critically engages Woltertorff’s account of justice by challenging the political status of its archaeological defence of rights language, its prioritizing of ‘primary’ and therefore ‘procedural’ justice, its suggestion to think of rights as ‘social bonds’ and the validity of subjecting God and world under one and the same concept of ‘worth’

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Global justice and the limits of human rights.Dale Dorsey - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (221):562–581.
Consumer Rights: An Assessment of Justice. [REVIEW]Gretchen Larsen & Rob Lawson - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 112 (3):515-528.
Reconceptualizing human rights.Marcus Arvan - 2012 - Journal of Global Ethics 8 (1):91-105.
The language of rights and conceptual history.Oliver O'Donovan - 2009 - Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (2):193-207.
On global justice.Mathias Risse - 2012 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
So what is justice anyway?Chelsea Luthringer - 2000 - New York: Rosen Pub. Group.
Justice: a reader.J. Sandel Michael (ed.) - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
19 (#778,470)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references