What Can Feminist Epistemology Do for Surgery?

Hypatia 29 (2):404-421 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Surgery is an important part of contemporary health care, but currently much of surgery lacks a strong evidence base. Uptake of evidence-based medicine (EBM) methods within surgical research and among practitioners has been slow compared with other areas of medicine. Although this is often viewed as arising from practical and cultural barriers, it also reflects a lack of epistemic fit between EBM research methods and surgical practice. In this paper we discuss some epistemic challenges in surgery relating to this lack of fit, and investigate how resources from feminist epistemology can help to characterize them. We point to ways in which these epistemic challenges may be addressed by gathering and disseminating evidence about what works in surgery using methods that are contextual, pluralistic, and sensitive to hierarchies

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The case against coronary artery surgery.Jochen Schaefer - 1980 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 1 (2):155-176.
Addressing Within-Role Conflicts of Interest in Surgery.Wendy A. Rogers & Jane Johnson - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (2):219-225.
The Guild of Surgeons as a Tradition of Moral Enquiry.Daniel E. Hall - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (2):114-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-07

Downloads
44 (#352,984)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Wendy A. Rogers
Macquarie University
Mary Jean Walker
La Trobe University

Citations of this work

Philosophers on drugs.Bennett Holman - 2019 - Synthese 196 (11):4363-4390.
Treatment Effectiveness and the Russo–Williamson Thesis, EBM+, and Bradford Hill's Viewpoints.Steven Tresker - 2022 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 34 (3):131-158.

Add more citations