Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (4-5):521-539 (2020)

Rebecca Walker
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
This essay explores three issues in respect for autonomy that pose unfinished business for the concept. By this, I mean that the dialogue over them is ongoing and essentially unresolved. These are: whether we ought to respect persons or their autonomous choices; the role of relational autonomy; and whether nonhuman animals can be autonomous. In attending to this particular set of unfinished business, I highlight some critical moral work left aside by the concept of respect for autonomy as understood in Beauchamp and Childress’ Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Specifically, while significant pragmatic traction is gained by the authors’ focus on autonomous choice, carving such a focus out from the broader questions of moral respect and the autonomy of the person leaves aside a number of questions that we might have thought a view about respect for autonomy in biomedicine ought to answer. These include: How should physicians respond when autonomous patients make decisions that appear nonautonomous? What is the impact of the view that autonomy is “relational” for cross-cultural differences in how autonomy is respected? If chimpanzees can be autonomous, what does that mean for how they should be treated?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/jhaa016
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,259
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Relational Autonomy, Normative Authority and Perfectionism.Catriona Mackenzie - 2008 - Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (4):512-533.
Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy.Natalie Stoljar - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Response to Commentaries.Tom L. Beauchamp & James F. Childress - 2020 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (4-5):560-579.
Forty Years of the Four Principles: Enduring Themes From Beauchamp and Childress.Matthew Shea - 2020 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (4-5):387-395.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Autonomy, Property and Distributive Justice.Malik Douglass Mccluskey - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Medical Ethics Needs a New View of Autonomy.R. L. Walker - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (6):594-608.
Whose Life is It Anyway? A Study in Respect for Autonomy.M. Norden - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (3):179-183.
A Non-Ideal Authenticity-Based Conceptualization of Personal Autonomy.Jesper Ahlin Marceta - 2019 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (3):387-395.
Respect for Persons, Autonomy and Palliative Care.Simon Woods - 2005 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8 (2):243-253.
The Objects of Respect.Elizabeth Foreman - 2015 - Environmental Ethics 37 (1):57-73.
Autonomy, Oppression, and Gender.Andrea Veltman & Mark Piper (eds.) - 2014 - New York, USA: Oxford University Press USA.
Autonomous Pigs.David Judd & James Rocha - 2017 - Ethics and the Environment 22 (1):1-18.


Added to PP index

Total views
26 ( #441,337 of 2,518,718 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,867 of 2,518,718 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes