How Dialogic Settings Influence Evidence Use in Adolescent Students

Zeitschrift Für Padagogische Psychologie 30:121-132 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This study examines how evidence is used differently in argumentative discourse compared to individual arguments. Applying a 1×2 crossover study design, 37 secondary school students were asked either to discuss a social issue with their partner before individually writing an essay outlining their opinion or, vice versa, first to discuss and then to write. As background information, they were provided with pieces of evidence with different levels of quality. Dialogs and essays were analyzed regarding (a) the type of evidence and (b) the way evidence was used. Results showed that in their essays students referred more often to the pieces of evidence provided to them (shared evidence). In contrast, they used evidence more often to address the opposing viewpoint in dialogs by incorporating it in a more elaborated (clearer) line of reasoning. Findings suggest that dialogues are a more effective tool than individual writing production, and the study provides first hints regarding how to design curricula that will encourage students to use evidence in a more sophisticated way in their argumentation.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Knockdown Arguments.Michael Wreen - 1995 - Informal Logic 17 (3):316-336.
May the force be with you.Michael J. Wreen - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):425-440.
Ad Baculum.John Woods - 1976 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 2 (1):133-140.
Ad Baculum.John Woods - 1976 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 2 (1):133-140.
The Ad Baculum Re-Clothed.Alan Brinton - 1992 - Informal Logic 14 (2).
Argumentum ad baculum.John Woods - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (4):493-504.
The nature of the argumentum ad baculum.Gary Jason - 1987 - Philosophia 17 (4):491-499.


Added to PP

341 (#59,491)

6 months
107 (#39,685)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fabrizio Macagno
Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa

References found in this work

Knowledge and Justification.John L. Pollock - 1974 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Edited by John Pollock.
Emotive Language in Argumentation.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2014 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation.Douglas Walton - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 14 references / Add more references