The Feminist Competition/Cooperation Dichotomy

Journal of Business Ethics 55 (3):243-254 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Feminist literature sometimes posits that competition and cooperation are opposites. This dichotomy is important in that it is often invoked in order to explain why mainstream economics has focused on market activity to the exclusion of non-market activity, and why this fascination or focus is sexist. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that the competition/cooperation dichotomy is false. Once the dichotomy is dissolved, those activities which are seen as competitive (masculine) and those which are seen as cooperative (feminine) are no longer mutually exclusive but are, in fact, dependent upon one another. It is shown that the outcome of competition (more and better knowledge) enhances, and in some cases makes possible, cooperation. The function of battle is destruction; of competition, construction. Ludwig von Mises.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cooperation, competition, and democracy.Shaomeng Li - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (2):273-283.
Potentials of Cooperation.Anton Leist - 2011 - Analyse & Kritik 33 (1):7-34.
Competition and cooperation.Jules Coleman - 1987 - Ethics 98 (1):76-90.
Cooperation and competition.Morton Deutsch - 2011 - In Peter T. Coleman (ed.), Conflict, Interdependence, and Justice. Springer. pp. 23--40.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#377,987)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?