The fool and the ontological status of st Anselm's argument

Heythrop Journal 15 (4):406–422 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1468-2265.1974.tb00780.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Arthur J. banning press minneapolis.Jasper Hopkins - unknown
St. Anselm's Proslogion with A reply on behalf of the fool.Maxwell John Charlesworth - 1979 - Notre Dame [Ind.]: University of Notre Dame Press. Edited by M. J. Charlesworth, Gaunilo & Anselm.
Millican on the Ontological Argument.Yujin Nagasawa - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):1027-1040.
The ontological argument.Graham Oppy - 2007 - In Paul Copan & Chad V. Meister (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: Classic and Contemporary Issues. Oxford UK: Blackwell.
Reading Anselm's Proslogion: The History of Anselm's Argument and its Significance Today.Ian Logan - 2008 - Ashgate. Edited by Anselm.
In Defense of Anselm.Mark Owen Webb - 2005 - Philo 8 (1):55-58.
The ontological argument simplified.Gareth B. Matthews & Lynne Rudder Baker - 2010 - Analysis 70 (2):210-212.
Some Ontological Arguments.Hugh S. Chandler - 1993 - Faith and Philosophy 10 (1):18-32.
The relevance of Kant's objection to Anselm's ontological argument.Chris Heathwood - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (3):345-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
25 (#595,425)

6 months
7 (#339,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references